<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did you call me?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/</link>
	<description>News, views, tips and tricks on Oracle and other fun stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sankar</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50829</link>
		<dc:creator>Sankar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 23:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50829</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If I use this in a member procedure of an object, I don't get the procedure name.  I get the object name.  Tom Kyte's link (who_am_i) also does not give the name of the procedure.  How do I get this informatopn?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I use this in a member procedure of an object, I don&#8217;t get the procedure name.  I get the object name.  Tom Kyte&#8217;s link (who_am_i) also does not give the name of the procedure.  How do I get this informatopn?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petr Svoboda</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50434</link>
		<dc:creator>Petr Svoboda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50434</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The problem with this approach is that it tells me what package called my procedure but not which procedure or function inside that package.
This information is not included in the stack. Any help here?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with this approach is that it tells me what package called my procedure but not which procedure or function inside that package.<br />
This information is not included in the stack. Any help here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Awad</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50089</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Awad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50089</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, why not. They are basically the same to me:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;pre&gt;&lt;code&gt;SQL&#62; exec my_proc
ANONYMOUS BLOCK . called MY_PROC from line number 1

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL&#62; begin my_proc; end;
  2  /
ANONYMOUS BLOCK . called MY_PROC from line number 1

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, why not. They are basically the same to me:</p>
<pre><code>SQL&gt; exec my_proc
ANONYMOUS BLOCK . called MY_PROC from line number 1

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL&gt; begin my_proc; end;
  2  /
ANONYMOUS BLOCK . called MY_PROC from line number 1

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
</code></pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob V</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50088</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob V</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50088</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Why not just
EXEC my_proc;
?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just<br />
EXEC my_proc;<br />
?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kyte</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50075</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50075</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Very nice - thanks Eddie - much more "clear" now (and tabbing works :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice - thanks Eddie - much more &#8220;clear&#8221; now (and tabbing works <img src='http://awads.net/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Awad</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50074</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Awad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50074</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Tom,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;OWA_UTIL is an old package indeed. In fact, by looking at the source code I see that its creation date was 07/09/95.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I appreciate your feedback regarding the comment form. All icon image tags do have &lt;em&gt;alt&lt;/em&gt; attributes. But, I had to add the &lt;em&gt;title&lt;/em&gt; attribute to make it work both in IE and Firefox. So, now if you hover your mouse over an icon, you should see a tooltip popup.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In any case, I have added text next to each field to make it clearer. I have also fixed the tab order of the fields.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope that will make it easier for you to comment in the future -- Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>OWA_UTIL is an old package indeed. In fact, by looking at the source code I see that its creation date was 07/09/95.</p>
<p>I appreciate your feedback regarding the comment form. All icon image tags do have <em>alt</em> attributes. But, I had to add the <em>title</em> attribute to make it work both in IE and Firefox. So, now if you hover your mouse over an icon, you should see a tooltip popup.</p>
<p>In any case, I have added text next to each field to make it clearer. I have also fixed the tab order of the fields.</p>
<p>I hope that will make it easier for you to comment in the future &#8212; Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Kyte</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50073</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Kyte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2006/10/17/did-you-call-me/#comment-50073</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;there is a good reason it looks alot like my code.... :)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;owa_opt_lock was originally mine - many of the owa_* stuff in owa_util was, from 1995 way back when...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your comment screen is really hard to use, the tab key doesn't take you from field to field naturally (you almost have to mouse) and the field icons take a bit of thinking to figure out what they are (no ALT tags??  took me a while to figure out the first one must be my name and the second must be my email address...)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is a good reason it looks alot like my code&#8230;. <img src='http://awads.net/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>owa_opt_lock was originally mine - many of the owa_* stuff in owa_util was, from 1995 way back when&#8230;</p>
<p>Your comment screen is really hard to use, the tab key doesn&#8217;t take you from field to field naturally (you almost have to mouse) and the field icons take a bit of thinking to figure out what they are (no ALT tags??  took me a while to figure out the first one must be my name and the second must be my email address&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
