<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Back to basics: anti-joins and semi-joins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://awads.net/wp/2007/05/01/back-to-basics-anti-joins-and-semi-joins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/05/01/back-to-basics-anti-joins-and-semi-joins/</link>
	<description>News, views, tips and tricks on Oracle and other fun stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Awad</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/05/01/back-to-basics-anti-joins-and-semi-joins/#comment-50735</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Awad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 19:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2007/05/01/back-to-basics-anti-joins-and-semi-joins/#comment-50735</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for this tip Eric. Very interesting and good to know. One would think that "ANSI SQL" and "Oracle SQL" &lt;em&gt;should&lt;/em&gt; behave the same in Oracle. So, This gotcha looks like an Oracle bug to me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this tip Eric. Very interesting and good to know. One would think that &#8220;ANSI SQL&#8221; and &#8220;Oracle SQL&#8221; <em>should</em> behave the same in Oracle. So, This gotcha looks like an Oracle bug to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://awads.net/wp/2007/05/01/back-to-basics-anti-joins-and-semi-joins/#comment-50734</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 14:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awads.net/wp/2007/05/01/back-to-basics-anti-joins-and-semi-joins/#comment-50734</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A great set of articles on joins, however, there is a big GOTCHA! waiting for Oracle developers adopting ANSI joins:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you are writing queries that select from many tables, like denormalizing data for warehousing, and the sum of the columns in those tables exceeds 1,050, you'll always get ORA-01445.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This occurs from 9i through 10g2, and has happened often enough to me that I avoid my preference for ANSI syntax on Oracle databases, unless I'm just selecting from a few tables.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just something to watch out for.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;thanks again for the articles!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great set of articles on joins, however, there is a big GOTCHA! waiting for Oracle developers adopting ANSI joins:</p>
<p>If you are writing queries that select from many tables, like denormalizing data for warehousing, and the sum of the columns in those tables exceeds 1,050, you&#8217;ll always get ORA-01445.</p>
<p>This occurs from 9i through 10g2, and has happened often enough to me that I avoid my preference for ANSI syntax on Oracle databases, unless I&#8217;m just selecting from a few tables.</p>
<p>Just something to watch out for.</p>
<p>thanks again for the articles!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
